The Safety Syndrome

 

Every day we are reminded of safety in the workplace and the home: Buckle your seat belt, wear a back support, etc.

 

The tennis shoe industry is spending millions to promote a better shoe or jogging, basketball and walking.

 

Asbestos in schools and other buildings strike fear into everyone’s heart, yet we push ourselves around in our chairs on carpet every day, putting stress on our knees, hips and ankles.

 

Everywhere we look there is some promotion awakening safety on the workplace. The ergonomic chair industry has become a $1 billion plus industry because of the number of back problems taking place in the office workplace. (Today’s ergonomic chairs sell in a price range of $300-$1,000).

 

Yet in spite of this one sided progress, IBM, Digital Equipment, Apple Computer, Hewlett-Packard, and a division of Eastman Kodak have been sued over office workplace injuries.

 

 

The Bare Facts

Regardless of all the studies and innovations that have come on the market since the introduction of ergonomic chairs 15 years ago, the bare facts still exist that in offices throughout the 50 states the number of injury and Workers’ Comp claims is rising every year.

 

Throughout the 1980’s and the early 1990’s, the reported incidence of Cumulative Trauma Disorders (CTDs) had undergone an unprecedented increase according to the Cal-OSHA Standard Board. The bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported that the number of disorders associated with repeated trauma in the office environment has risen from 22,600 cases in 1982 to 185,400 case in 1990.

 

This represents over an eightfold increase, driving the portion of all occupational diseases represented by CTDs from 21 percent in 1982 to 56 percent in 1990. Since 1989, CTSs have been more prevalent than all other occupational diseases combined.

 

In all 50 states industrial accidents and Workers’ Comp claims are on the decrease. However, in high tech, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate related companies and the general office field, claims have risen 3.7 percent. For state and local government workers, the claim rate has risen 2.8 percent.

 

 

The computer as culprit

With a growing number of computer users in offices every year, there has been a great surge in computer related ailments.

 

Stewart B. Leavitt, Ph.D., in the November Office Products Industry Report, pointed out that “millions of office workers, each year often suffer debilitating aches, pains and other physical problems known as cumulative trauma disorders.”

 

The California Occupational Safety and Health Standards has defined CTD as “any physical disorder that develops from or is aggravating by the cumulative application of biomechanical stress to tissues and joints, including but not limited to, bursitis, ligament  and muscle strains (e.g. neck-tension syndrome), nerve entrapment (e.g. carpal tunnel syndrome) and similar disorders.

The Cal-OSHA board also identified several CTD risk factors, including force, “i.e., physical exertion by or pressure applied to any part of the body.

 

The Cal-OSHA board also identified several CTD risk factors including force “i.e. physical exertion by or pressure applied to any part of the body.”

 

RSI More Common

Less severe but more common than CTD is RSI (repetitive strain injuries) – “a general class of disorders which results from a gradual sprain or strain to the upper limbs (shoulders, arms, hands).

“According to Dr. Marvin Dainoff, director of the Center for Ergonomic Research at Miami University in Ohio, RSI is the result of four risk factors that act in combination: high rates of repetition, awkward posture/position, use of excessive force, and lack of adequate rest/recover.”

 

Lawsuits?

Stewart Leavitt has also noted “a spreading epidemic of claimed disabilities is feared by employers, insurance carriers, and legislators.”

The following information concerning Workers’ Compensation claims may vary from state to state. In California, the number of disabling, non-fatal injuries and illnesses has declined by nine percent per year, according to a 1991 report.

In spite of this number, the incidence of claims by workers in the office field has risen 6.5 percent per year. Back and spine injuries, including strains, sprains, dislocation and hernias, accounted for 51.5 percent of the claims.

Inflammation or irritation of bones, joints, tendons or muscles accounted for 0.8 percent.

 

 

A Light at the End of the Carpal Tunnel

Although carpal tunnel syndrome has received a great deal of attention in both the medial community and the media, the number of claims for this disorder accounted for only .04 percent of the total.

The number of disabling, non-fatal injuries and illnesses in California, in the finance, insurance and real estate industries, rose from 11,556 to 11,984 in the period 1990-1991.

Steve Lohr of the New York Times News Service reported in 1992 that every working day, more than 40 million Americans “hunch in front of desktop computers, and more and more of them are falling victim to painful, sometimes crippling, stress-linked injuries to their shoulders, arms, hands and backs.”

Over a period of some 15 years, we noted a growing trend to install long nap or deep pile carpeting in the office, and the concomitant elimination of floor mats to provide a hard surface on which to roll a chair.

We developed a theory to explain the growing number of medial problems relating to the back, knees and legs of people employed in various workplace situations.

 

Soft Shoulder Ahead

It seemed to us that trying to roll an ergonomic chair around on a carpet was like trying to drive a car in sand. There’s a good reason that state road departments post “soft shoulder” signs wherever needed. Just as driving a car around in sand would soon have a deleterious effect on various parts of the automobile, requiring a great deal more power and torque to move, pushing a chair around on carpet would be bound to create stress on certain body parts, especially for people over 40 years of age.

 

By the same token, since you would not attempt to play tennis or roll a bowling ball on deep carpet, why would you subject your body to such treatment?

It seemed logical to us that office workers who are required to move around while seated in a chair should have a hard surface, such as a hardwood floor mat, on which to roll.

 

Mosquitoes don’t cause Malaria!

When we propounded our theory to various architects, designers and members of the office equipment manufacturing fraternity, they all laughed, we knew then how Dr. Walter Reed felt when he tried to convince his colleagues that the mosquito was the basic cause of malaria.

One argument we often heard from these “experts” was that the invention of new kinds of chair caster eliminated the need for a hard surface.

But we were sure that we were right, that pushing a chair around on carpeting, regardless of the type of casters, creates stress on the legs, knees and back.

For that reason, we felt it was necessary to have an engineering study initiated on the subject of stress caused by moving around in a chair on various kinds of carpeted surfaces.

 

 

We were really in the Dark

When we at Angus-Stuart first began to have the test made for a load factor that went to or onto the lower extremities every time one moved in a chair on carpet, we had no idea where the test was going to take us.

The results were astounding: they indicated that every time you pushed you chair on deep pile carpet, you were, in theory, adding 80 to 90 pound to your pelvic, back knees and foot areas.

This damage is slight, and slow to generate health problem. But over a period of four or five years , the stress load factor will begin to show its damage with soreness, slipping discs, and – for a person over 40 years of age – the speed up toward traumatic arthritis.

 

 

Wheelchair Race

In 1978, Rancho Los Amigos Hospital in Downey, California conducted a study on the measured oxygen uptake among three groups of wheelchair users who moved their chairs across both concrete and carpeted floor surface.

 

The results were that all three groups traveled more slowly on the carpet, and showed a significantly greater degree of oxygen uptake per unit of distance traveled.

 

A bottom line summation of the entire report was that it took 36 to 56 percent more energy to push the wheelchair on outdoor carpet of that era. It would be interesting to see what their results would have been if the test were run on the present-day deep pile carpet over carpet cushion.

 

Dr. Marvin Dainoff led a study team at Miami University concerning the interface between and ergonomic chair and various floor surfaces, and an analysis of the friction involved.

 

A summation of Dr. Dainoff’s results was that it took 49 percent more energy to move on carpet than on a wood surface (in this case an Angus-Stuart Floor Mat).

 

What if

It wouldn’t matter if we bought every executive and office workers in America a $1,500 ergonomic chair, if they had to roll their chair on carpet. Workers’ Comp claims would continue to rise and workers would continue to develop traumatic arthritis. It could be compared to buying every office worker in America a new car and then requiring them to drive it in sand.

 

 

The Bottom Line

Regardless of the type of chair or casters used, if you are going to roll around on any type of carpet in an ergonomic chair, there should be a free wheeling hared surface to roll on.

There are still unanswered problems:

What happens when you raise your buttocks slightly to move your chair over carpet? According to people trained in this field at Norco Naval Laboratories, you are in a physical position in which the human body was never made to function.

What happens to exacerbate carpal tunnel syndrome and you aggravated should problems when you use your hands to push yourself from your work station or desk when you are rolling around on carpet?

 

The complete test from DR. Marvin Dainoff, Rancho Los Amigos Hospital or the Angus-Stuart Corp. is available by writing to Angus-Stuart.